Friday, February 22, 2008

community

Real Sex: The Naked Truth about Chastity: Lauren F. Winner

For most of human history, people of many different cultures have agreed that societies must order certain forms of exchange in order to survive. Communities have ordered language, establishing grammars nad vocabularies that shape how people comunicate with one another; they have ordered the exchange of money, property, and labor; and they have ordered the practice of sex. As essayist, poet, and novelist Wendell Berry has put it, "sex, like any other necessary, precarious, and volatile power that is commonly held, is everybody's business." In the last half-century, however, that assumption has been routed, replaced by the axioms of individualism and autonomy. Indeed, today the idea that sex "is everybody's business" sounds alternately shocking and silly...

...But in the Christian universe, the individual is not the vital unit of ethical meaning. For Christians, the most basic images, metaphors, and signs are corporate, and the basic unit of ethical meaning is the Body, the comunity. Israel experiences covenantal fidelity as a people, and the People of God is a collective- not merely an aggregate of individual persons, each doing his or her own thing, but a body. In the Bible, God elects the People of Israel as a body. He sustains them as a body. And, finally, He redeems them as a body. This talk about community is not metaphorizing. The community has a role i making ethics. Paul makes this clear when he instructs the Galatians to hold one another accountable for sin: "Brothers, if someone is caught in a sin, you who are spiritual should restore him gently. But watch yourself, or you also may be tempted. Carry each other's burdens, and in this way you will fulfil the law of Christ."

That passage in Galatians, if we construe it uncharitably, can lead us to envision a community that functions primarily as a police force: Christinas' responsibilities to one another begin and end with peering into other Christians' bedroom windows and sounding the alarm if something illicit is going on.

While one task of any community is to enforce its own codes when they are being violated, perhaps the prior task of the community is to make sense of the ethical codes that are being enforced. Here the community is not so much a cop as storyteller, telling and retelling the foundational stories of the community itself, sustaining the stories that make sense of the community's norms. This storytelling is part of hte working out of God's grace in the church. we, teh church, retell our own story- we do this every time we read scripture, every time we celebrate the Lord's Supper, and every time we minister to one another. And that reteling is part of what enables us to live into the story. It is the community that ensures that ethics is not about the dispensing of cut-and-dried answers to moral questions, but that ethics is the story with meaning and power.

2 comments:

Nicholas said...

I read this book over the summer. I found Ms. Winner dead on in many respects, but there were also respects in which I took mild to strong exception to what she said.

Here, I disagree with her giving primacy to the community over the individual. Just as within the Godhead the unity of the three persons as one exists perfectly with the diversity of the one person in three, I don't believe you can ascribe greater significance to the body or to the individuals of which it consists.

Jesus saves individual sinners, and he doesn't call them to lose their individuality as they merge into the collective of the Body. Becoming conformed to Christ's image makes you more yourself, not less.

Put another way, we know traditionally that Western societies are individualist and Eastern societies are collectivist. I don't believe that it is proper to label the Kingdom of God as a collectivist society, as I believe Ms. Winner puts forth here. Rather, I think it is neither and both.

This is not to say that individuals are not accountable to the Body in matters of morality. Rather, I think Ms. Winner overstates here the reasons why it is so.

This may not seem like an important distinction. But it seems so to me.

StefLenz said...

i agree...i don't think she's saying that you are becoming less individual. and yes, being comformed to Christ's image makes you more yourself. I think she's saying that the community has a necessary part in helping you to conform to Christ's image. i also think the statements i happened to choose probably more strongly reflect the community aspect than if you were to read the whole chapter.